![]() ![]() ![]() And while how a person reacts to 3D will be different individual to individual, I see no reason why anyone should suffer any sort of nausea from the extra dimension. The brightness of the image meant that there was no need to strain your eyes to see things with the added dimming effect of the 3D glasses. By and large, if you take your glasses off during the movie, the image you see is going to be pretty darn blurry and not really enjoyable to watch with your naked eye. ![]() There were a few instances where the foreground pets were fairly clear and looked 2D sans glasses with only the backgrounds being blurred, but not really enough to knock down the score. As you saw in the Before and Beyond the Window scores, this sequel has a healthy amount of 3D, and thus a lot of blur if you take your glasses off. If at any point you decide to take your 3D glasses off during The Secret Life of Pets 2, you’re going to see the blur that indicates the 3D effect that is being applied to the image. As always, this category could vary greatly between theaters and auditoriums. Maybe if a premium format presentation was available that could have been delivered. The only reason this movie doesn’t get top marks in this area is because while the image was bright enough to see, I couldn’t help but feel like it could have used just a little more punch. Even in the darker scenes, you never have to struggle to see the things you need to see. This is a brightly colored movie and the image is bright throughout. Whereas live-action 3D movies often struggle in the brightness department, their animated counterparts usually fare much better, and that holds true with The Secret Life of Pets 2. The cityscapes and wide-open landscape of the farm Max goes to all looked really good though. Still, mixing that up a bit more would have been nice. I generally interpreted it as the film making the artistic choice to generally have a shallower depth of field and not poor implementation of the 3D technology. That said, a lot of the deepest backgrounds weren't razor sharp. Even when the foreground elements weren’t explicitly popping off the screen, there was that consistent depth. The one thing that struck me is how much depth there was to the image throughout the movie. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |